A report by the National Association of Estate Agents suggests that the majority of agents feel that mortgage lenders and the surveyors who value for them are downvalueing property based on what might happen in the future rather than the present.
Our own experience certainly suggests there is a discrepancy between the price a surveyor often values a property for, compared to the price the agent, the owner and the person willing to buy feel the property is worth.
So who is right? The surveyors have a duty to try to safeguard the money a mortgage company lend, that is fair enough, but surely it's wrong when their valuation is taken more into account than agents or buyers?
A much more sensible thing would be that surveyors are not allowed to put what they believe the property is worth, but instead the maximum they would suggest a mortgage company should lend on the property. They are two different things.
Quite recently we sold a property, only for it to be downvalued. We sold it again, the new buyer offered £3000 more than the first buyer, only for it to be downvalued again, but by even more than the first time!
Who is right in this case?